#9 Research - Claudia L. Keh “Feedback in the Writing Process: A model and methods for Implementation.

Share three pieces of academic or professional reading and explain how they and other sources helped you form hypotheses about aspects of teaching that might contribute to current patterns of learning.


Reading #1: 

Claudia L. Keh “Feedback in the Writing Process: A model and methods for Implementation. 

Feedback is a fundamental element of a process approach to writing. It can be defined as input from a reader to a writer with the effect of providing information to the writer for revision. In other words, it is the comments, questions, and suggestions a reader gives a writer to produce ‘reader-based prose’ (Flower, 1979) Through feedback, the writer learns where he or she has misled or confused the reader by not supplying enough information, illogical organization, lack of development of ideas, or something like inappropriate word-choice or tense. 

She discusses the benefits of 3 types of feedback: 

  • Peer feedback

  • Conferencing 

  • Written feedback 

My take aways from this reading about each type of feedback are: 

Peer feedback: 

This is valuable feedback for gaining a wider sense of audience and the feedback given from peers would be at an appropriate level. I also took away that this form of feedback would need to be explicitly taught to the learners in order for it to benefit. 

Conferences:

Giving verbal feedback could be beneficial throughout the entire writing process and this also builds up the learners confidence in their writing. Claudia talks about preparing the learners for the conference before conference with focus questions. I wonder if this could be connected to the success criteria. 

Written comments:

These are useful for pointing out specific areas for improvement and making suggestions. It is also important to make sure that these comments include positive feedback.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

TAI post 5: My preliminary findings

Image
The results from the Combi Tool: From the Combi Tool data, we noticed that the learners are not necessarily shy and they are willing to communicate with others. However, they lack the ability to articulate elaborated responses. I am thinking about whether they are given opportunities to build on their responses? Are elaborate responses modelled or scaffolded to them regularly? We also notice that learners require prompting when responding and their responses are rarely spontaneous. This makes me wonder about the culture of the hub? Do we allow learners time to think about responses? Are they given time to share these responses regularly? What feedback is given to them about conversations? Student voice: What did you learn about today? "I learnt how to stop and sound out words.” Answers show that learners do not have the dialogue to discuss what they have been learning about. They touch on the surface of the learning but it is not specific. Reflection: Could I gi...
Read more

Empathetic Educators: Session 1 on CBT

Image
CBT (Cognitive Behavioural Therapy)  I am stoked to be working closely with a lovely colleague; Naomi who has done loads of research around neuroscience around how the brain affects our emotions and behaviour.  Our first session was about CBT: Fear, Anxiety, trauma, behaviour that challenges us. We came away with a lot of things to think about as well as a bank of helpful resources to support learners who might be struggling with anxiety.  Naomi discussed the idea that often our thoughts and feelings are built up to be a lot greater than they really are and often we need to capture the thought and then break it down with evidence for and against that thought. From that we can hopefully create a change in the way that we are feeling.  Here is a diagram/visual that could be useful to explain this (for ourselves, as well as learners).  Reflection: As teachers, we often find ourselves worrying and over thinking constantly. Could th...
Read more

#8 How the data will be used as baseline data at the end of the year

Image
  Explain how some of the data you have used to build a profile of the students’ learning will be used as baseline data at the end of the year. As you can see in post #4,  we have collected formative assessment data from Running Records, Little Learners Love Literacy and Liz Kane's 'The Code' spelling tests to gather baseline evidence for where our target learners are sitting at the beginning of the year. We will use these assessments throughout the year and will monitor their progress. If we notice that there has been no shift in the data at the middle of this inquiry, we will revaulate.  We have also decided to monitor the wellbeing of these learners. Stonefield's has developed a Wellbeing Assessment Tool called Te Whare Tapa Wha. We will use this to monitor the wellbeing of learners at the beginning of the year and the end.  We are also able to track their wellbeing progressions through Schooltalk. Below is a snapshop of target learners wellbeing gap analysis:...
Read more